Legal Opinion
State v. Martissa
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 11, 2009No. 2D08-2339PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILBERMAN, Judge.
The State appeals an order suppressing statements Mauro A. Martissa made without Miranda 1 warnings in this prosecution for possession of cocaine and driving while license suspended or revoked. Because Miranda warnings were not required during this traffic stop that evolved into an investigatory detention, we reverse the suppression order and remand for further proceedings.
At the suppression hearing, Officer Hils-don testified that on September 19, 2007, Officer Bradshaw was working in a covert capacity observing people who came and went from a suspected drug house. Officer…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ramirez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- United States v. Jorge Nicolas AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. C.D.M.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Horne v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Cook v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
- State of Florida v. Eddie PokeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
- State v. CDMDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.