Arrellano v. Sonoma County
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FRANCISCO ARRELLANO, et al., Case No. 23-cv-00187-DMR 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON SECOND MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 SONOMA COUNTY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 53 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiffs Francisco Arrellano and his minor son S.A., by and through his guardian ad litem 13 Arrellano, filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”) against Defendants Sonoma County and 14 Deena Mistry. [Docket No. 52 (FAC).] Defendants now move to dismiss all claims under Federal 15 Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). [Docket No. 53 (Mot.).] The court held a…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.