Legal Opinion

State v. Gooche

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 3, 1982No. 8114SC1227PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant’s first two arguments relate to the following jury instructions:

The defendant Gooch has been accused of possessing marijuana, which is a controlled substance, with intent to sell or deliver. For you to find the defendant guilty of possessing marijuana, which is a controlled substance, with the intent to sell or deliver it, the State must prove three things each beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, the State must prove and beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant knowingly possessed marijuana. A person possesses marijuana when he is aware of its presence and has both…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. MeshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. State v. McGillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. . StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. State v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GoochSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. WelchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. ShoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  4. State v. ShoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API