State v. Gooche
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Defendant’s first two arguments relate to the following jury instructions:
The defendant Gooch has been accused of possessing marijuana, which is a controlled substance, with intent to sell or deliver. For you to find the defendant guilty of possessing marijuana, which is a controlled substance, with the intent to sell or deliver it, the State must prove three things each beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the State must prove and beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant knowingly possessed marijuana. A person possesses marijuana when he is aware of its presence and has both…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. MeshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- State v. McGillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. . StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- State v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. GoochSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. WelchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. ShoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. ShoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018