Garrison v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Judge.
Insofar as the motion to suppress evidence is based on an illegal search, it does not appear that the premises were searched or any evidence seized. The entry was by permission of the owner who directed the officers to his bedroom where they found and arrested the defendant. Insofar as it is based on an illegal arrest without a warrant, the facts known to the arresting officers at the time, including substantially the chronology detailed above except for the fingerprint evidence, was sufficient to constitute probable cause for them to believe that the defendant had committed an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sides v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Peters v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Holley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- State v. . NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Pippen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Bogan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Barlow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Knighton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.