Legal Opinion

State v. Mason

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 1986No. 16056PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

Jon Mason was charged with cultivation of a controlled substance based on evidence seized from his home pursuant to a search warrant. He moved to suppress the evidence and to compel production of a non-party’s telephone records. The district court denied both motions. Mason then entered a conditional plea of guilty in order to appeal these rulings. I.C.R. 11(a)(2). Mason contends that: (1) there was insufficient evidence of probable cause for the search warrant, mandating exclusion of the seized evidence; and (2) the court erred in failing to compel production of records…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Segura v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. HolmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. State v. HagedornIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. State v. DeskinsMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. DeskinsMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. PrestwichIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API