Legal Opinion
Davis v. Rawhide Gold Mining Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 22, 1910No. Civ. No. 725PublishedCited by 1 opinion
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tuolumne County, and from an order denying a new trial. G. W. Nicol, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This is an action to recover the amount represented by certain sixty-eight checks or drafts drawn by defendant, payable to sundry persons, of which said checks or drafts Charles Zany, plaintiff’s assignor, was drawee. These checks read as shown by the following example:
“Not Transferable.
No. 1055.
“Quartz, California, Jan. 29, 1909.
“Office of the Rawhide Gold Mining Co.
“Pay to F. Nelson only $30.25
“Thirty 25/100 Dollars
“Due for labor for the month of Jan. 1909.
“THE RAWHIDE GOLD MINING CO.
“C. E. Lang.
“To C. Zany.
“Quit. Quartz, Cal.”
Across the left-hand margin words “App Mine” appeared and the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- St. Louis Natl. Bank v. GayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Renaud v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Steele v. SellmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
- Hart v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Lindsay v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. SantosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933