Legal Opinion
United States v. Atlantic Refining Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 5, 1930No. 272PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The charter party, dated September 5, 1924, hired the tank steamer Baldhill to the appellee to proceed to one safe United States gulf port, excluding Houston; the charterers having the privilege of loading at:
“(Atreco and Port Arthur or Sabine to count as one port)
“(Smith’s Bluff and Sabine or Port Arthur to count as one port)
“(Beaumont and Sabine, to count as one port)
“(Pasadena or Sinco and/or Texas City to count as one port).”
A further provision of the charter was that the vessel proceed to the loading port “or so near thereunto as she may safely get (always afloat)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The Gazelle and CargoSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Yone Suzuki v. Central Argentine Ry., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Mencke v. Cargo of Java SugarSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- The Edward T. StotesburyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
- Aktieselskabet Christianssand v. W. R. Grace & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Coastal Barge Corp. v. Coastal Zone Industrial Control BoardSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
- Florida Marine Contractors v. WilliamsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
- Campbell v. American Export Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- Immigration Consequences of Undocumented Aliens' Arrival in United States Territorial Waters, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1993
- Sun Oil Co. v. Atlantic Refining Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1930