Legal Opinion

Petition of DeOrsey

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 19, 1973No. 73-128-M. P., 73-183-M. P., 73-256-M. PPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelleher, J.

We have consolidated these three petitions which ask that we reverse the refusal of the Board of Bar Examiners to recommend the petitioners’ admission as members of the bar of this state. Hereafter, when necessary, we shall refer to the petitioners by their last names.

All three petitioners are graduates of law schools having the accreditation of the American Bar Association. They are in all respects, but one, qualified to practice law in Rhode Island. Their one deficiency is an inability to pass the written portion of the bar examination. DeOrsey and Baccala have taken the examination three…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re GriffithsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. R.I. Bar Asso. v. Auto. Service Asso.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1935
  3. Application of PetersonAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Staley v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. In Re MonaghanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sinapi v. RI Board of Bar ExaminersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  2. Millett v. Hoisting Engineers' Licensing Division of the Department of LaborSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  3. MeadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Harper v. District of Columbia Committee on AdmissionsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. In Re TestaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API