Legal Opinion

Kiernan v. The Manhattan Quotation Telegraph Company

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1876PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, J.

— The questions to be determined in the decision of this case, are three in number:

First. Had the plaintiff any right of property in the foreign financial news obtained by him from the Associated Press "Corporation, and transmitted by him to his customers % Second. Has the defendant, the Manhattan Quotation Telegraph Company, made use of this news by transmitting it over the wires to its customers ?

Third. If the plaintiff had a right of property in the news received by him from .the Associated Press, did he abandon such right when he transmitted the news to his customers ?

The Associated Press…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Folsom v. MarshU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1841
  2. Palmer v. . De WittNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jewelers' Mercantile Agency v. Jewelers' Weekly Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. F. W. Dodge Co. v. Construction Information Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. Werckmeister v. Springer Lithographing Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1894
  4. Jones v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. F. W. Dodge Corp. v. ComstockNew York Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API