Kiernan v. The Manhattan Quotation Telegraph Company
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, J.
— The questions to be determined in the decision of this case, are three in number:
First. Had the plaintiff any right of property in the foreign financial news obtained by him from the Associated Press "Corporation, and transmitted by him to his customers % Second. Has the defendant, the Manhattan Quotation Telegraph Company, made use of this news by transmitting it over the wires to its customers ?
Third. If the plaintiff had a right of property in the news received by him from .the Associated Press, did he abandon such right when he transmitted the news to his customers ?
The Associated Press…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Folsom v. MarshU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1841
- Palmer v. . De WittNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jewelers' Mercantile Agency v. Jewelers' Weekly Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
- F. W. Dodge Co. v. Construction Information Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Werckmeister v. Springer Lithographing Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1894
- Jones v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- F. W. Dodge Corp. v. ComstockNew York Supreme Court · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.