Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Shoemaker

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 11, 2022No. 1:22-cv-00354Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAMAL BENNETT, : Plaintiff : : No. 1:22-cv-0354 v. : : (Judge Rambo) BRAD SHOEMAKER and : MARK LUSK, : Defendants : MEMORANDUM Plaintiff Jamal Bennett, who is currently in pretrial detention in Lycoming County Prison, initiated the above-captioned pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He asserts constitutional tort claims against two Lycoming County officials based on allegedly deficient medical care. Defendants move to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Bennett seeks leave to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API