Legal Opinion

Hart v. Greis

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 24, 1941No. 14215PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This suit is in the form of trespass to try title, but the parties agree that the sole issue is one of boundary. Plaintiffs claim to be the owners in fee of the surface and the minerals, and defendant claims under a mineral lease issued to him on December 23, 1938, by Wm. H. McDonald, Commissioner of the General Land Office, covering the land in controversy, which is a tract containing 101.1 acres, lying in Wichita County. Defendant claims that the land in question is vacant, unpatented land, lying' between the E. Durain and the M. L. Gahagan Surveys. Plaintiffs claim…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stafford v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Taylor v. Higgins Oil & Fuel Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Stroud v. SpringfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Blaffer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Turnbow v. BlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hudspeth v. HudspethCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  2. Darling v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  3. Giles v. KretzmeierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Thomas Jordan, Inc. v. Skelly Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Gill v. GrimesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API