Legal Opinion

Hardin v. Dale

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 23, 1915No. 3919PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from >Superior Court, Logan County; 8. 8. Lawi'ence, Judge. Action by Frank Dale and another against E. W. Hardin and others. Judgment .for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

On June 28, 1911, Frank Dale, defendant in error, sued E. W. Hardin and six others, as makers on their past-due promissory note for $1,495.65, made, executed, and delivered on September 16, 1909, to- the Guthrie School & Office Furniture Manufacturing company, as payee, and by the company indorsed to the plaintiff Frank Dale. The petition alleged that plaintiff acquired the note in good faith for value and before maturity. For answer defendants, in effect, admitted the execution of the note and its indorsement as pleaded, and that plaintiff had paid value therefor before maturity, but set…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martin v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Forbes v. First Nat. Bank of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. United Society of Shakers v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1873
  4. Lyman v. President of the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  5. Merchants' Bank v. RudolfNebraska Supreme Court · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Duncan v. CarsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  2. Halsell v. First Nat. Bank of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Dodo v. StockerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  4. Coopersmith v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928
  5. Brown Oil Co. v. ShipleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API