Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 25, 1956No. 14577_1PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge.

Herein we have a question of whether the Woolworth Company must furnish certain payroll information to a representative of a clerk’s union (hereafter called “local”), the collective bargaining agent for the employees of the company’s store at San Bernardino, Calif.

The demand was for names, hours and wages of employees over a period immediately preceding the demand. The Woolworth Company refused and refuses to supply the requested information other than names of employees and initial classification.

The Labor Board has found an unfair labor practice and petitions here…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. American National InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Truitt Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Insurance Agents' International UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. The Timken Roller Bearing Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  3. Emeryville Research Center, Shell Development Company, a Division of Shell Oil Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  4. General Electric Company, Battery Products, Capacitor Department v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  5. J. I. Case Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API