Legal Opinion

Glenn v. Hollums

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 18, 1934No. 4313PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice.

Hollums and wife, Mrs. Maude E. Hollums, instituted this suit under Senate Bill No. 3, Acts of the 43d Legislature (Second Called Sess.) chapter 16, commonly known as the Moratorium Act (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 3804 note). They made E. S. Randerson, sheriff of Floyd county, and H. C. Glenn, receiver of the Temple Trust Company, parties defendant.

The purpose of the suit was to restrain the execution of a judgment rendered against the plaintiffs in the district court of Bell county November 28, 1933, in favor of Glenn as receiver of the Trust Company, and against John A.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Mingus, Receiver v. WadleyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Cleveland v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Henry v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Webb v. ReynoldsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Lubbock v. StubbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  2. Glenn v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Brown v. Lubbock Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. City of Lubbock v. StubbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API