Ted Spangenberg Co., Inc. v. Peoples Natural Gas, Division of Northern Natural Gas Company
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NEVILLE, District Judge.
Appellant here, plaintiff below, asserts that the trial court in a non jury diversity case, erred in its findings of fact and conclusions of law which resulted in an order of judgment for defendant, 305 F.Supp. 1129. After a careful review of the record and the briefs of counsel, we find no error and we affirm. A somewhat detailed recital of the facts is necessary to an understanding of the issues raised.
Plaintiff-Appellant, an Oklahoma corporation engaged in the business of installing heating and air-conditioning equipment, seeks a recovery of $12,966.-94 from the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- St. Louis Typographical Union No. 8, Afl-Cio v. Herald Company, D/B/A Globe-Democrat Publishing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Cataphote Corporation, a Corporation v. De Soto Chemical Coatings, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, a Corporation v. Pioneer Valley Savings Bank, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Regency Savings Bank v. Westmark PartnersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Neely v. American Family Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996