Legal Opinion
Cat's Paw Rubber Co. v. Barlo Leather & Findings Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 15, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
Defendants move for judgment on- the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.
Plaintiff’s rubber 'heels and rubber products have gained considerable renown in the metropolitan New York area. The products are widely advertised and they apparently enjoy an estimable repute. Authorized wholesalers in the metropolitan region distribute the products. They are constrained by resale price agreements with plaintiff and they in turn are bound, under the terms of that agreement, to sell only to retailers who agree to sell at…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Friedman v. Washburn Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- MacDonald v. Du MaurierCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Behrens v. SkellyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sunbeam Corp. v. Payless Drug StoresDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
- Donovan Construction Co. v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1955
- Des Moines Area Dairy Queen Store Operators & Owners, Inc. v. Wapello Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1975