Legal Opinion

Connecticut General Life Ins. Co. v. Bertrand

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 18, 1932No. 2201PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This was a suit by appellee against appellant, on allegations of total permanent disability, -upon two policies of life insurance issued in appellee’s favor under a plan of group insurance whereby appellant insured appellee as an employee of Gulf Oil Corporation and its subsidiary companies. The policies in issue contained a clause insuring appellee against total permanent disability. In his petition he plead two policies, one for $2,500 and the other for $3,000, and prayed also for 12 per cent, damages and reasonable attorney’s fees under provisions of article 4736, R. S. 1925. On the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Union Central Life Insurance v. ChowningTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Norwood v. Washington Fidelity Nat. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. American Surety Co. v. FielderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Universal Life & Accident InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co. v. BertrandTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of California v. BerryhillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. American Nat. Ins. Co. v. WalshCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API