Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Rennie v. Klein

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 13, 1983No. Nos. 79-2576, 79-2577Published

1ConcurrenceAdams, Circuit Judge

I have no doubt that the New Jersey regulations found in Administrative Bulletin 78-3 satisfy the due process requirements of the Constitution. I also agree that today’s decision is controlled by Youngberg v. Romeo, 457 U.S. 307, 102 S.Ct. 2452, 73 L.Ed.2d 28 (1982), rev’g Romeo v. Youngberg, 644 F.2d 147 (3d Cir. 1981) (in banc). I cannot, however, join in the limited professional judgment standard articulated by Judge Garth and, as the author of the least intrusive means standard *271enunciated in Romeo, I believe it is incumbent upon me to write separately.

The issue before this Court continues…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Rennie v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. DiGiovanni v. PesselNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  4. Romeo v. YoungbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API