Legal Opinion

Lance Oldridge v. City of Wichita, Kansas, et al.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided July 1, 2026No. 6:21-cv-01284Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS LANCE OLDRIDGE, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 21-1284-EFM CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgement filed by Defendants Anna Hatter, Robert Layton, and the City of Wichita (Doc. 199). Plaintiff Lance Oldridge alleges that Defendant Hatter and Layton are liable for retaliating against him under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

by terminating his employment with the Wichita Police Department (“WPD”) in violation of the First Amendment. He brings three claims against the City, all…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API