Legal Opinion

Bartlett v. Arthur Andersen LLP

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 24, 2003No. 01-17327; D.C. No. CV-00-852-PHX-SMMPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs allege that Baptist Foundation of Arizona, Inc. (“BFA”) and its affiliates sold millions of dollars worth of promissory notes to buyers, primarily Southern Baptists, who were promised a “tremendous opportunity to be found faithful.” Plaintiffs allegedly invested over $3 million in BFA offerings. Although the investments were marketed as highly secure and profitable, in reality, it was an extremely speculative and high-risk “Ponzi” scheme.

Plaintiffs assert their claims against four groups of Defendants: (1) presumed officers and directors of BFA and its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,272, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5268, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8535 in Re Stac Electronics Securities Litigation. Timothy J. Anderson Neil Singer Arthur Singer, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Gary W. Clow Douglas Whiting Robert Johnson Alex Brown & Sons Incorporated Lawrence FinchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Kaplan v. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,639 Cal Swenson and Carolyn Swenson v. Richard and Ralph EngelstadCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. Westlands Water District v. Firebaugh CanalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. David J. Gallo, Movant-Appellant v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Real Party in Interest-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API