Legal Opinion
Ainbinder v. White Ash Land Ass'n
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 28, 2005No. Civ.A.4:03-0676Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MANNION, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the court is the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 18). Based upon the court’s review of the record and relevant case law, the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment will be denied, (Doc. No. 18), and the action for declaratory judgment, (Doc. No. 1), will be dismissed.
On April 25, 2003, the plaintiffs initiated the instant action in which they seek a declaratory judgment to order the defendant to: (1) allow them to backfill mine pits on a certain tract of land known as the “Bliss tract” located in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Boyle v. County Of Allegheny PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Childers v. JosephCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.