Legal Opinion

People v. Semien

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 2008No. C053802PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, Acting P. J.

We hold that the prosecutor did not violate the constitutional rights of defendant by using a peremptory challenge to excuse a prospective juror who was an African-American pastor whose spouse worked in the county welfare department.

We also hold that conviction for violation of Penal Code section 245, subdivision (c) (assault on peace officer), 1 constitutes a “strike” even though the assault was not with a deadly weapon.

Defendant Anthony Marvell Semien, Jr., appeals following his conviction for evading a police officer while driving recklessly (Veh. Code, § 2800.2,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. People v. GutierrezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. VinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. People v. C.D. (In re C.D.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. In re C.D.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. People v. Falcon CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. People v. MirandaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API