People v. Semien
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, Acting P. J.
We hold that the prosecutor did not violate the constitutional rights of defendant by using a peremptory challenge to excuse a prospective juror who was an African-American pastor whose spouse worked in the county welfare department.
We also hold that conviction for violation of Penal Code section 245, subdivision (c) (assault on peace officer), 1 constitutes a “strike” even though the assault was not with a deadly weapon.
Defendant Anthony Marvell Semien, Jr., appeals following his conviction for evading a police officer while driving recklessly (Veh. Code, § 2800.2,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. GutierrezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. VinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. C.D. (In re C.D.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- In re C.D.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- People v. Falcon CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. MirandaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016