Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hannan v. Alltel Publishing Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 2008No. E2006-01353-SC-R11-CVPublished

1Dissent

WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., J.,

dissenting.

The Court’s decision in this case alters summary judgment practice in Tennessee by dramatically changing the moving party’s burden of production. From henceforth, parties seeking a summary judgment in Tennessee’s courts will no longer be able to shift the burden of production to the nonmoving party by demonstrating that the nonmoving party’s evidence is insufficient to establish an essential element *12of a claim or defense asserted by the non-moving party. This change in direction goes far beyond what is required to determine whether the summary judgment in…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Byrd v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Staples v. CBL & Associates, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API