Legal Opinion

Kendall v. Daggett

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 21, 1996No. 671; CA A89425PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

In this residential FED proceeding, defendant tenant appeals the denial of his motion for attorney fees under ORS 90.255. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiffs filed an FED action against defendant in district court seeking possession of rental property that defendant occupied. ORS 105.105 et seq. Defendant filed an answer, which included the affirmative defense that plaintiff’s notice to terminate was defective. ORS 90.400(l)(a); 24 CFR § 882.511 (1995). 1 Before trial, defendant filed a motion under ORCP 21 A(5) 2 to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it did not comply with the notice…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Executive Management Corporation v. JuckettOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. West v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Tanner v. GrissomCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Domingo v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Erickson v. R&R Ranches, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API