Legal Opinion

Brink v. Lackawanna Mutual Fire Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 9, 1927No. Appeal 40PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

This was a suit on a fire insurance policy. The defenses were that without consent endorsed on the policy, the premises had been left vacant over ten days, that other insurance had been taken out without similar consent, and that the policy had been cancelled a few days before the fire. The first two were sustained and a non-suit was entered. The refusal to take off the non-suit and two rulings on evidence are assigned for error. The latter need not be discussed, for in this disposition of the appeal, it is immaterial whether appellant received the policy by mail (3rd…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Simons v. Safety Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Levinton v. Ohio Farmers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Davis v. Home InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Smith v. West Branch Mutual Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  5. Devaney v. Northwestern National InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kramer v. Rhode Island InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Cocceolle v. Westchester F. Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API