Legal Opinion
Wasson v. Beekman
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided February 19, 1934No. 4-3373PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
On June 27, 1925, Annie R. and EL EL. Beekman became indebted to the Bank of DeQueen, of DeQueen, Arkansas, in the sum of $5,000, and, to secure its payment, executed a mortgage to that bank covering blocks 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 of the Garrison Addition to the city of DeQueen. The mortgage secured the debt then due, which was evidenced by a note payable six months after date, and also any renewals thereof. The note was not paid, and was renewed from time to time, the last renewal being oh March 22, 1929, the note then executed in renewal being payable six months after date.
The mortgage was duly…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Oil Fields Corporation v. DashkoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Garner v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
- Less v. EnglishSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Applewhite v. Harrell Mill Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
- Teal v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. GarrottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
- Hadley v. CoreyNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
- Hamburg Bank v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Soule, Guardian v. First Nat'l Bank of Ft. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
- Little v. EvansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.