Mills v. Hallgren
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Wapello District Court. — Hon. O. W. Vermillion, Judge. Petitions in the entitled causes were presented to Hon. C. W. Vermillion, a judge of the Second Judicial District, and a hearing on April 12, 1909, ordered. Subsequently petitions of intervention praying for 'the same relief and answers to both pleadings were filed. A hearing was had, at the conclusion of which temporary writs of injunction were denied and from this ruling in each case E. A. Mills appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
The defendant in the first two actions, Hallgren, and Shuckrow, the defendant in the third, were engaged in selling and keeping for sale intoxicating liquors in their respective places of business in the city of Ottumwa. A written statement of consent in pursuance of section 2448 of the Code had been filed with the county auditor of Wapello County in February, 1900, found sufficient by the board of supervisors, and its finding en*217tered of record. Section 2450, Code. On December 22, 1908, a verified petition, requesting that the bar to prosecutions of persons interposed because of compliance…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carroll County v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- County of Cass v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Vance v. AustellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
- In re DennyIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Hawkins v. Board of SupervisorsMississippi Supreme Court · 1874
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City v. WoodworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- State Ex Inf. Barrett v. ImhoffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
- Caton v. FrankNevada Supreme Court · 1935
- Hevelone v. City of BeatriceNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
- Taylor v. Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.