Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Knox

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1879PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Ionia. Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

Knox sued Nathan JB. Hayes, Samuel W. Webber, and David B. Corey, who were formerly private bankers in' Hubbardston, upon a certificate of deposit for $1,085.56, dated February 4, 1876, and drawing interest at 10 per cent.

The defense set up was that in the fall of 1876 Hayes and his. associates sold. out their banking business and assets to Edward B. Percival and H. E. Jackson, who agreed to take up this certificate, and that Knox agreed to look to them and extended the debt on new terms, and that the new firm became insolvent.

All the questions turned on this defense. Knox recovered judgment,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. SheldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Hogsett v. EllisMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Meister v. BirneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Turner v. McCartyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Pratt v. BatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. FaldeSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1886
  2. Ferris v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Ayres v. GallupMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Union Guardian Trust Co. v. Marquette Park Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Darling v. RutherfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API