Legal Opinion

Lozano v. Agustin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 13, 2015No. C130814RO; A154753PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.

In this appeal from a judgment of punitive contempt for violation of a Family Abuse Prevention Act (FAPA) restraining order, we are asked to decide whether the trial court’s remarks to defendant about the risks of testifying were so impermissibly coercive as to violate defendant’s right to testify under Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution and the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.1 We conclude that the trial court’s advice — which would have communicated to a reasonable person in defendant’s position that the trial court would sentence…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  2. James Douglas Jones v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2024
  3. Jeremy Michael Wissman v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API