Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 5, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStearns, J.

These are three bills in equity brought by complainants, stockholders of Narragansett Cotton Mills, Incorporated, a Rhode Island corporation, hereinafter called the company, in behalf of complainants and other stockholders, to have certain shares of the capital stock of the company now held by said respondents, returned to the company and cancelled on the ground, that said stock was bonus or promotion stock, which was issued illegally without adequate consideration and . without any valid vote or action of the corporation authorizing it. The company is made a respondent in each case, it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. LewisohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Hayward v. LessonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  4. Fred Macey Co. v. MaceyMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Yale Gas Stove Co. v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Café La France, Inc. v. Schneider Securities, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2003
  2. Henderson v. Plymouth Oil Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1925
  3. Gemini Investors, Inc. v. Ches-Mont Disposal, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
  4. Adaskin v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927
  5. Jeffs v. Utah Power & Light Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API