Legal Opinion

In Re Mahurkar Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Patent Litigation. Sakharam Mahurkar, Quinton Instruments Company v. Impra, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided December 12, 1995No. 94-1242PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLAGER, Circuit Judge.

Impra, Inc. appeals from the January 25, 1994 revised judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Easterbrook, J., sitting by designation, holding Impra hable for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,583,968 (the ’968 patent) and awarding lost profit damages of $4,589,-472. The district court held, inter alia, that Impra literally infringed claims 1-3, 6-8, 11 and 20-23 of the ’968 patent, and failed to prove that these claims were invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) (1988). 1 In its decision, reported at 831 F.Supp. 1354, 28 USPQ2d 1801…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Shatterproof Glass Corporation, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Libbey-Owens Ford Company and Leybold-Heraeus Gmbh, Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. Brooktree Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  4. Umc Electronics Company v. The United States, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Cross v. Nicolet Instrument Corporation, a Wisconsin Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. C.R. Bard, Inc. v. M3 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. Mas-Hamilton Group v. Lagard, Inc., (Now Known as Masco Corporation) and Hi-Shear Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  3. Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  4. In Re Terazosin Hydrochloride Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2005
  5. In Re Terazosin Hydrochloride Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API