Legal Opinion

In re Rodney J.

New York Family Court

Decided January 30, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Elrich A. Eastman, J.

Upon reargument of this motion, the People urge upon this court the sufficiency of this petition, supported primarily by the respondent’s statement admitting the act. In doing so, the People liken this petition to an indictment and cite the authorities upholding the legal sufficiency of indictments supported by confessions which are prima facie competent.

Respondent opposes this and refers to the statutory scheme as to the nature of the petition and the legal sufficiency thereof. (Family Ct Act, § 311.1, subd 4; § 311.2.) He requests the court to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Anthony S.New York City Family Court · 1973
  2. In re E. C.New York Family Court · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Edward B.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. In re Rodney J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. In re Gloria F.New York City Family Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API