Goodman v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BROOMFIELD, Chief Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., defendant Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation (“B & W”) moves for summary judgment on Count I of plaintiff’s Complaint, which alleges breach of an implied agreement to terminate only for “good cause.” 1 The parties have fully briefed the matter, and the Court held a hearing on November 29, 1993. Having carefully considered the parties’ arguments, the Court now rules.
1. BACKGROUND
In October, 1988 B & W hired plaintiff Sharon Diane Goodman (“Goodman”) to work as a sales representative. In conjunction with her application for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Reid v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Almada v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2000