Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided December 7, 1993No. 92-1570 CIV PHX RCBPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BROOMFIELD, Chief Judge.

Pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., defendant Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation (“B & W”) moves for summary judgment on Count I of plaintiff’s Complaint, which alleges breach of an implied agreement to terminate only for “good cause.” 1 The parties have fully briefed the matter, and the Court held a hearing on November 29, 1993. Having carefully considered the parties’ arguments, the Court now rules.

1. BACKGROUND

In October, 1988 B & W hired plaintiff Sharon Diane Goodman (“Goodman”) to work as a sales representative. In conjunction with her application for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Reid v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Almada v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API