Legal Opinion

Boeke v. International Paint Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 12, 1980No. 8358-9-IPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James, A.C.J.

Defendant, International Paint Company, Inc. (IPC), a California corporation, appeals from personal injury judgments entered in the plaintiffs' favor following a 6-week jury trial. Because both plaintiffs, John Boeke and Leo Murphy, claimed under the same products liability theory, the cases were joined for discovery and trial and are consolidated in this appeal. We affirm.

IPC produces a 2-part industrial epoxy coating named Intergard tank coating. The curing agent used in the coating contains a chemical composed of ethylenediamine and methyl isobutyl ketone. The agent is a skin…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. John R. McWeeney v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  2. Perfection Paint & Color Co. v. KondurisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Teagle v. Fischer & Porter Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Hinzman v. PalmanteerWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Little v. PPG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cox v. SpanglerWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Cox v. SpanglerWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Stover v. Lakeland Square Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  4. Johnson v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Sutton v. ShufelbergerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API