Legal Opinion

Kurtz v. Kurtz

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1971No. Docket 6315PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal of right from a divorce judgment granted to plaintiff wife and the division of property made pursuant thereto. Appellant, Lucille Kurtz, seeks a change in the property settlement. On cross-appeal Walter Kurtz seeks to have the divorce judgment vacated and the divorce granted to him. He claims her asserted grounds were insufficiently proved.

Although this Court hears a divorce case do novo on the record, it will not substitute its judgment for that of the trial judge, absent a showing of abuse of discretion. Heckelman v. Heckelman (1966), 3 Mich App 159; Hildebrandt v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Heckelman v. HeckelmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Hildebrandt v. HildebrandtMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mixon v. MixonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. York v. YorkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Ripley v. RipleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Schaffer v. SchafferMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Perry v. PerryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API