Legal Opinion

Murphy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 25, 2004No. 2D03-1580PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge.

In this appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Clay Murphy challenges his conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine with the intent to sell. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Murphy’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170.

Rule 3.170(i) allows a defendant to challenge the entry of his plea within thirty days after sentencing based on the reasons set forth in Florida Rule of Appellate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. PartlowSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  3. Watrous v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Odegaard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Ayesh v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API