Legal Opinion
Joyner v. Mofford
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided May 24, 1982No. CIV-82-196-TUC-ACMPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARQUEZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff has brought this action in the United States District Court praying that this court declare unconstitutional Article XXII, § 18 of the Constitution of the State of Arizona and to enjoin the defendants from enforcing that provision against the defendant. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202.
Defendant Rose Mofford is the Secretary of State for the State of Arizona and is statutorily required to accept petitions of candidates for federal office. Defendant, Robert Corbin is the Attorney General of the State…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lake Country Estates, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lámar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Buckingham v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Conrad Joyner v. Rose Mofford, Secretary of State, State of Arizona Robert K. Corbin, Attorney General, State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Laos v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984