Legal Opinion

United States v. Roberta Williams and Frances Harris

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 1, 1976No. 75-2144, 75-2154PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TONE, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Roberta Williams and Frances Harris were convicted in a jury trial of making false material declarations in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623. The declarations had been made when they testified as alibi witnesses in the trial, and again in the retrial, of a federal criminal charge against Leroy Williams, the husband of Roberta Williams. On appeal the defendants argue that the district judge abused his discretion in refusing to grant a continuance and that the declarations in question were not shown to have been false.

Leroy Williams was tried in the United States…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. Dwight L. ChapinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. Robert F. DevittCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Charles Edward Louderman, United States of America v. Jacquelyn Mary Louderman, AKA Jackie WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. Richard Finucan and Dee RoccaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. GormanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Dudley BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. Edward Sinclair WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API