Legal Opinion · Dissent

MacArangal v. Andrews

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided July 21, 1992No. 05-92-00616-CVPublished

1DissentBaker, Justice

The majority concludes the respondent’s December 31, 1991 dismissal order is interlocutory. Because of this conclusion, the majority denies the writ of mandamus. I think the order is final. I would grant the writ. I respectfully dissent.

THE UNDERLYING LITIGATION

In September 1990, real parties in interest William Max Schmidt and his wife sued relators Eduardo Macarangal and Metro Airlines, Inc. The Schmidts’ causes of action against relators arose from injuries Mr. Schmidt sustained in an accident at the Dallas/Fort Worth Airport in July 1989, when a baggage conveyor driven by Mr. Schmidt…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Butts v. Capitol City Nursing Home, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. McConnell v. MayTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Fort Worth Lloyds v. HaygoodTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Davis v. McCray Refrigerator Sales Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API