Legal Opinion
In re Michael U.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 9, 2013Published
1Opinion of the Court
In related child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, Marcus U. appeals from an order of fact-finding of the Family Court, Queens County (Richroath, J.), dated December 20, 2011, which, after a hearing, found that he sexually abused the child Judith C.Z., and derivatively abused the children Michael U, Matthew Z.-U., and Melaine U.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The determination by the Family Court that the appellant
*822sexually abused the child Judith C.Z. is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act § 1046 [b];…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- In re Nicole V.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. PavaoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Commissioner of Social Services v. Philip De G.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Badr v. HoganNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.