Legal Opinion

Buchanan v. Cleveland Linseed-Oil Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 7, 1898No. 27PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. This was an action by the Cleveland Linseed-Oil Company against Buchanan & Sons on an account for goods sold. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Circuit Judge.

Upon the trial of this action, there was a verdict for the plaintiff, by the direction of the court; and the defendant has brought this writ of error to review the judgment entered upon the verdict, assigning error of the direction, and of several rulings of the trial judge. Only those assignments will be noticed that have been argued.

The action was brought to recover for goods sold and delivered, and the single issue presented by the pleading was whether the plaintiff sold and delivered to the defendant, about August 16, 1895, one tank car of linseed oil, containing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chapman v. BarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Accident Insurance v. CrandalSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Matheson's Admin. v. Grant's Admin.Supreme Court of the United States · 1844
  4. Robertson v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Frazier v. PoindexterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  2. Stillwagon v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1908
  3. Arbitration Between Interbras Cayman Co. v. Orient Victory Shipping Co., S. A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  4. Bankers' & Shippers' Ins. Co. of New York v. MurdockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API