Legal Opinion
Case-Swayne Co. v. Sunkist Growers, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 29, 1968No. 66PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
'Mr. Justice Marshall
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is a treble-damage action under § 4 of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 731, 15 U. S. C. § 15, for alleged violations of both § 1 and § 2 of the Sherman Act, 26 Stat. 209, as amended, 15 U. S. C. §§ 1, 2. The District Court granted a directed verdict, at the close of plaintiff’s case, for the defendant, Sunkist Growers, Inc. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed as to that portion of the complaint predicated on § 2 of the Sherman Act, holding that sufficient evidence was presented that Sunkist monopolized or attempted to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Allen Bradley Co. v. Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Winckler & Smith Citrus Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Assn., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Case-Swayne Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Sunkist Growers, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
3Cited by77 opinions
- Group Life & Health Insurance v. Royal Drug Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc., William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Keith v. VolpeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Greyhound Computer Corporation, Inc. v. International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.