Legal Opinion
Hanover Insurance v. Alisa Construction Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 3, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Arthur M. Schack, J.
Plaintiff, the Hanover Insurance Company, as subrogee of E.T. Disch Construction, L.L.C., moves, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), to dismiss the counterclaim filed against it by defendants Alisa Construction Co., Inc., Boymelgreen Developers, Inc., Boymelgreen Developers, L.L.C., and Boymelgreen Holdings, L.L.C. (collectively, defendants).
According to the complaint, subrogor E.T. Disch Construction, L.L.C. hired defendants to perform construction work at 318 Albany Avenue, Brooklyn, New York. Thereafter, defendants subcontracted with defendant Capitol…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fehlhaber Corp. & Horn Construction Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Kane v. KaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Fettretch v. . McKayNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Edelman v. EdelmanNew York Supreme Court · 1976
- Moreno v. GaldorisiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Finish Line v. J.F. Pate & Associates Contractors, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
- Liskiewicz v. HameisterNew York Supreme Court · 2010