Legal Opinion
Deitz v. Shelby Cty. Pros. Office
Ohio Court of Claims
Decided July 31, 2025No. 2025-00339PQPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Deitz v. Shelby Cty. Pros. Office,
2025-Ohio-2881.] IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO PAUL LEONIDAS DEITZ Case No. 2025-00339PQ Requester Special Master Todd Marti v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SHELBY COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE, et al. Respondents {¶1} This case is before me for a R.C. 2743.75(F) report and recommendation. I recommend that the court (1) order the respondents to produce unredacted copies of the records filed for in camera review, (2) find that respondents unreasonably delayed their response to requester’s November 9, 2025 records request, (3) order respondents to reimburse…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Ohio Republican Party v. FitzGerald (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- State ex rel. Wadd v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Strothers v. NortonOhio Supreme Court · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Thompson v. Tiffin City SchoolsOhio Court of Claims · 2026