Legal Opinion
Performance Motorcars v. Peat Marwick
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 23, 1994PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
274 N.J. Super. 56 (1994)
643 A.2d 39
PERFORMANCE MOTORCARS OF WESTCHESTER, INC., A/K/A PERFORMANCE LEASING CORP., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
KPMG PEAT MARWICK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 26, 1994.
Decided June 23, 1994.
Before Judges BRODY, STERN and KEEFE.
Douglas M. Calhoun argued the cause for appellant (Calhoun & Associates, P.C., attorneys).
Dennis R. LaFiura argued the cause for respondent (Pitney, Hardin, Kipp & Szuch, attorneys; Mr. LaFiura and James F. Baxley, on the brief).
The opinion of the court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- H. Rosenblum, Inc. v. AdlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Veazey v. DoremusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc. v. Peat Marwick Main & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Li Fu v. Hong FuSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Ronson v. TalesnickDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Pittston Co. v. Sedgwick James of New York, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Performance Motorcars of Westchester, Inc. v. MARWICKSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- In Re Phar-Mor, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.