Legal Opinion

Lee Hong v. Schoenwald

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1915No. 12716PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered February 15, 1915, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

In the spring of 1913, plaintiff and the Pacific Coast & Norway Packing Company, a fish canning concern, entered into a written agreement whereby plaintiff agreed to furnish the cannery crew for the packing season of 1913, and to pack, lacquer, and label the cans for nine hundred cases of flat cans or thirteen hundred cases of tall cans of salmon, each day during the packing season, and in case of failure, plaintiff should pay the company for the shortage one dollar per case as liquidated damages. The agreement covered every phase of the work. It contains a proviso that:

“If such shortage of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Olson v. Snake River Valley RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Oldfield v. Angeles Brewing & Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Cunningham v. LakinWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Peterson v. BarryWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Lang v. Crescent Coal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hartman v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Phoenix Assurance Co. v. Columbia & Puget Sound RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API