Henry v. Shevinsky

FOSTER, Justice.

The question in this case is whether schedule 117 of section 348 of the Revenue Act of 1935, as it appears on page 488 of the General Acts of 1935, is unconstitutional because it is an arbitrary classification in that the schedule of license charges thus set out does not expressly embrace a license charge in cities between 10,000 and 15,000 population. It fixes a license charge for dealers in radios graduated’ according to the population of the city in which the business is conducted. Appellee is engaged in such business in Birmingham which is in the class embracing cities of…