Legal Opinion
City of Dallas v. Massingill
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided May 14, 1987No. 05-86-00393-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCRAW, Justice.
Robert L. Massingill filed a class action suit on behalf of the members of the Dallas police and fire departments against the City of Dallas, the City Manager, the Fire Chief, and the Police Chief (the City). Mas-singill asserts that the City has not provided class members with the number of vacation days required by Texas Revised Civil Statutes article 1269p, section 3. In a bench trial with stipulated facts, the court found that the City had failed to meet the statutorily mandated vacation requirements for policemen and firemen. The class members were to be awarded damages…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Jauregui v. Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985
- P.T. & E. Co. v. Beasley, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1985
- Coffman v. City of Wichita FallsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wadkins v. LecuonaNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- City of Dallas v. Massingill, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1993