Legal Opinion

Wadkins v. Lecuona

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 2007No. S-06-1008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.

Richard A. Wadkins appeals from an order of the district court, affirming a determination of the Nebraska Appeal Tribunal that Wadkins had received unemployment insurance benefits to which he was not entitled. Wadkins had been laid off and was not performing services for his employer while he was receiving unemployment insurance benefits. But Wadkins was receiving money from his employer for compensatory time (comp time) Wadkins had accrued and for commissions on sales Wadkins had made before he had been laid off. The question presented in this appeal is whether the payments Wadkins received…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Suastez v. Plastic Dress-Up Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
  2. In Re Wil-Low CafeteriasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  3. General Motors Corp. v. ErvesMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. McIlravy v. Kerr-McGee Coal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. PolinskyNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fisher v. PayFlex Systems USANebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Brandon Pierce v. Collection Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  3. Brandon Pierce v. Collection Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  4. Lang v. Howard CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API