Legal Opinion

Walter v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 28, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed on the law with costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: Plaintiff sustained severe injuries as the result of his headfirst dive from a bridge into the Salmon River. Defendant, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (Niagara Mohawk), controlled the water level of the river through a series of dams. Plaintiff alleged that Niagara Mohawk was negligent in failing to warn of the danger in diving from the bridge and in artificially regulating the water level so that it varied by substantial amounts over short periods of time.

Supreme Court erred in granting defendant’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boltax v. Joy Day CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Howard v. Poseidon Pools, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Kriz v. SchumNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Savage v. DelacruzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Kandrach v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wamco XVII, Ltd. v. Chestnut Estates Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Johnson v. HarringtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Toyrola v. St. DenisNew York Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API